Showing posts with label historic photography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label historic photography. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

WOMEN IN ART: ANNA ATKINS

Some of you may have noticed that the other day (March 16th) Google had a Doodle celebrating Anna Atkin's 216th Birthday. She was a botanist and a photographer using her photographic techniques to document and study many different plants.
First learning of photogenic drawing and calotypes through the inventor, William Henry Fox Talbot and her husband's friend. Herself and Constance Talbot, William Henry Fox Talbot's wife, are known as the first women photographers. She was able to learn about cyanotypes through her husbands friendship with Sir John Herschel, who invented the cyanotype in 1842. After learning the process, Atkins created many photograms of dried algae and then created a book of her studies and photograms in 1843. This book is known to be the first book to have photographic images, even though it was privately published and not many copies were made. Less than a year later Talbot created his book "The Pencil of Nature" which is the first commercially published book to be illustrated with  photographs.
Title Page of Anna Atkins "Photographs of British Algae: Cyanotype Impressions", 1843, cyanotype photogram, Spencer Collection/ Stephen A. Schwarzman Building, NY Public Library
Introduction of Anna Atkins "Photographs of British Algae: Cyanotype Impressions", 1843, cyanotype photogram, Spencer Collection/ Stephen A. Schwarzman Building, NY Public Library

Cystoseria granulata, Anna Atkins "Photographs of British Algae: Cyanotype Impressions", 1843, cyanotype photogram, Spencer Collection/ Stephen A. Schwarzman Building, NY Public Library
Atkins went on to create two more volumes of "Photographs of British Algae: Cyanotype Impressions" and in the 1850s collaborated with Anne Dixon to create more cyanotype books: "Cyanotypes of British and Foreign Ferns" (1853), "Cyanotypes of British and Foreign Flowering Plants and Ferns" (1854). In addition to the photographic books she also wrote many books, without photograms, of her studies.
Poppy, Anna Atkins "Cyanotypes of British and Foreign Flowering Plants and Ferns", about 1854, cyanotype photogra, Victoria and Albert Museum, London

I've written a previous post about Dark Room Photography and how important it is, so check it out if you're curious: link here. But I never fully described what cyanotypes are. So here's a detailed description:
-First you mix together equal volumes of a photosensitive solution of 8.1% potassium ferricyanide and 20% ferric ammonium citrate.
-Then you brush it evenly on a natural fibered cloth/paper. And set to dry in a dark room.
-A positive image will be produced when the emulsion covered paper is shown to UV light (sunlight or UV fluorescent lights) with a negative image laying straight on the emulsion. This is called a contact print because the negative and the emulsion must be in flat contact to avoid any blurriness.
-Once the image is a steely blue/gray then you take it out from under the light and wash it in a water bath washing off the yellow iron that was reduced by the UV.
-After you wash off the iron you can wash the print in another bath of water and a splash of 3% hydrogen peroxide which darkens the blues of the print.
-These prints can also be toned after they're dried through tea, bleach, and wine among other things.

You can find many scans of her cyanotypes online and the actual pages and scans across London.

Monday, April 7, 2014

VISITING MUSEUMS: MET & WHITNEY BIENNIAL

If some of you follow my Twitter (@ArtOtter) then you know that I recently went to New York to visit the Met and the Whitney Biennial. There is a ton of stuff going on that you don't want to miss out on so let's start with the Met. 

If you've ever been to the Met then you know of the amazing collection they have there. Vast as that collection is they have some special shows going on currently that push it further. Historic Photographs (salt prints, daguerreotypes, albumen prints) are currently on view as apart of their Charles Marville: Photographer of Paris exhibition. Now as long as I've been studying Photography I've still never seen a daguerreotype in person. They have 2 on show and they are fascinating and amazing. A picture really doesn't do it justice until you are standing in front of it and just in awe of the beautiful silver reflections. Now that exhibition is only up until May 4th so hurry over. It's quite a beautiful collection.

Charles Marville, Rue de Constantine, 1865, Albumen silver print from glass negative
Another quite special thing going on at the Met is their William Kentridge installation, The Refusal of Time. This piece has moving sculptures and 5 channel video projection. As you get closer to this piece you can only hear it. Then once you get into the space, it's really quite amazing how you're fully embedded into the piece itself. At first it can be uneasy but once you start to look at everything you will realize how beautiful and mesmerizing it is. That's all I'll say about this piece because you really just have to see it in person.
Other exhibitions worth checking out at the Met are: The Passions of Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux (AMAZING artist who can portray torment and realism through his flawless sculptures, paintings, and drawings) and many more

Now moving on to the Whitney Biennial... I've never been to the Whitney before so I absolutely had to see this last biennial before they move. I had heard from previous years that it was mainly focused on performance and just really strange art, so going into it I really didn't know what to expect but to keep my mind open. The pieces that were included in this Whitney, I thought were amazing. I had barely any problems with the works I saw. I actually thoroughly enjoyed majority of it. I felt inspired and I understood what was trying to be portrayed. Some of my friends on the other hand had a completely different experience. They didn't know what was going on, they didn't consider it art, and they were very unhappy with the show. Now I truly don't know what show they saw but I saw something completely different. With that I'll explain which pieces I really loved.

Karl Haendel. wow. I am hugely in awe of Robert Longo's work as a whole and now seeing Haendel's work I am a huge fan of his as well. An entire wall dedicated to a truly talented draughtsman with amazing sense of composition and positive negative space. His drawings go from fully rendered to black void spaces, but yet feel complete. I could go on and on about him but I'll save that for another post. 

Karl Haendel, Theme Time - Presidents Day, 2013, pencil on paper 69"x52"
Keith Mayerson's large salon style collection of paintings included images from a guy jerking off to a family portrait. The range of styles and images was really awesome and it was almost overwhelming with the amount of paintings that covered the small room. It really takes a long time to get through the room. 
Paul P.'s Untitled small ink drawings were really ghostly and beautiful. The small collection was all you needed because of the detail and control in which he used. More of a classical style but definitely delicate and gorgeous. 
Paul P., Untitled, ink on paper, 2013, 11 3/4" x 8 1/2"
There also were a few interesting installation pieces. One being by Valerie Snobeck and Catherine Sullivan and the other being by Bjarne Melgaard. Snobeck and Sullivan's piece was very inventive and beautiful, including ghostly blueprint images and suitcases. On the other hand, Melgaard's included pillows the shapes of penises, and violent scenes being projected on the walls of a gaudy and sexual themed plush room. I've got to say, I can see where some people will obviously be upset about Bjarne Melgaard's piece but when I was in the room there was an older couple and they were not upset or running out of the room. It spoke a lot of animal instincts and tension along with the need to hold back and show restraint. I actually felt that the message was good and as if this is what could happen if people didn't restrain themselves and how dystopic that would actually be.
There are so many other artists that are worth discussing but I don't have the time/space to keep writing about the Biennial. I will continue on about some other pieces though during the rest of this week, so stay updated!

Citations:
Charles Marville: http://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2014/charles-marville
William Kentridge: http://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2013/william-kentridge
Met Exhibitions: http://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/current-exhibitions
Karl Haendel: http://whitney.org/Exhibitions/2014Biennial/KarlHaendel
Paul P.: http://whitney.org/Exhibitions/2014Biennial/PaulP
Bjarne Melgaard: http://whitney.org/Exhibitions/2014Biennial/BjarneMelgaard